Home / I. Other uses: testing, clothing, entertainment / Part IND
"Bees make extra honey."
honey is the bees' food reserve for periods without flowers, not a surplus. In beekeeping it's taken and often replaced with sugar syrup. Honeybees are kept like domestic animals and can compete with native bees, which are the main pollinators in many ecosystems; there are some 20,000 bee species worldwide. And there is growing evidence that bees have experiences, which the New York Declaration recognizes as a realistic possibility.
Short answer
Honey is the bees' food reserve, not a surplus; in beekeeping it's often replaced with sugar syrup. The bees in decline are wild native species, not honeybees, which are kept like domestic animals and can compete with them for flowers and spread disease. Buying honey doesn't help native bees. And there's growing evidence that bees have experiences.
For children
Bees make honey so they have food in winter, when there are no flowers. When people take the honey, they often give the bees sugar water instead. Besides, there are lots of wild bees that live freely and help plants. They're the ones that need protecting.
"If the problem is the decline of native bees, does keeping more honeybees help?"
Como pode aparecer
"Honey is natural."
"Without beekeepers, bees disappear."
"Bees don't even feel anything."
"Buying honey saves the bees."
"Beekeeping is essential for pollination."
"Fish and invertebrates don't feel pain." (which is A6)
The strongest version
"Honey is natural. Without beekeepers, bees disappear. Bees don't even feel anything."
Strongest version (steelman):
- P1Bees produce more honey than they consume in good seasons.
- P2Beekeeping helps maintain bee populations, which are important for pollination.
- P3Bees are insects, with little or no capacity to suffer.
- CSo eating honey causes no harm and even helps bees.
P1 is partly true. P2 confuses honeybees, which are kept animals, with native bees, which are in decline. P3 is increasingly disputed by science.
The argument is valid. Its soundness fails at P2 and P3.
Full answer
- a
Reconstruction and diagnosis
The argument confuses two groups of bees:
Group Situation Relationship to honey Honeybees (Apis mellifera) Kept by beekeepers, like domestic animals Produce commercial honey Native bees (around 20,000 species worldwide) Many in decline from habitat loss and pesticides Not helped by buying honey - b
Where the argument breaks
1. Honey is a reserve, not a surplus.
Bees store honey for periods without flowers. Beekeeping removes that store and often replaces it with sugar syrup, which is nutritionally inferior.
2. Honeybees are kept animals.
They aren't threatened with extinction for lack of beekeeping. The decline that worries scientists is that of native bees.
3. Honeybees can harm native bees.
A 2017 review found that most competition studies indicated negative effects of managed bees on wild bees, and that a large share of the disease studies pointed to transmission risks. The evidence is still debated, but the claim that honey "saves the bees" doesn't hold up.
4. Bees may have experiences.
The New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness (2024) recognizes a realistic possibility of consciousness in insects. Research shows bees learn, play and respond flexibly to stimuli.
5. Beekeeping also kills bees.
When honey is harvested, when hives are transported and when queens are replaced.
- c
Data and sources
Source What it says Note Mallinger, Gaines-Day and Gratton, 2017, *PLoS ONE* 53% of competition studies found negative effects of managed bees on wild bees; 70% of pathogen studies pointed to potential negative effects A systematic review; later studies find mixed results The New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness (2024) A realistic possibility of consciousness in insects Signed by hundreds of researchers - d
The strongest counter-reply: beekeeping helps crop pollination
The most serious version points out that many crops depend on pollination by honeybees, and that beekeeping is important for food production.
- e
Why the counter-reply doesn't reach the conclusion
Pollination doesn't depend on eating honey.
It's a service that can be paid for separately, as already happens.
Native bees pollinate too.
And often more efficiently for certain crops.
It doesn't answer the question about honey.
Buying honey isn't the same as supporting pollination.
- f
Back to the moral question
Honey is a borderline case, and there are honest debates about insect experience. But the argument used to defend it, that it saves the bees, is false. If there's uncertainty about what bees feel, and easy alternatives to honey, caution recommends leaving it to them.
Reasoning errors
Logical
Is the form valid?
Equivocation
Epistemological
Does the evidence support it?
Not knowing the ecology
Certainty about the unknown
Biases
Halo effect
Honey seems natural and healthy in every way
General literature on the halo effect
Extrapolations
The principle being tested is: "if a species is kept in large numbers, it's protected".
If it applied to…ChickensTap to see
They'd be protected, because there are billions
This is the argument of B6
If it applied to…HoneybeesTap to see
They'd be helping bees in general
They can harm native bees
If it applied to…Farmed animals in generalTap to see
They'd be fine, because they're numerous
Ignores the individual
Contradictions
But doesn't support native bees, which are in decline.
And replaces it with sugar.
The "they don't feel" criterion is used only here.
What the argument gets right
What is true
The decline of bees is a real and serious problem, and pollination is essential for food production. Well-run beekeeping can play a role in agriculture, and insect experience is indeed an open question.
But
But buying honey doesn't protect the bees that are in decline, and may even harm them. Protecting bees means protecting their habitats, reducing pesticides and planting flowers, not eating their food reserve.
Connections
Usually comes before
Usually comes after
Go deeper in Questão de Ética
Chapters from the open-access collection A Journey Through Animal Ethics that discuss this argument in more detail:
- The Exploitation of Insects and Why We Should Oppose It Vol. IV, ch. 19