For the Animals
An Argument Guide
PT

Home / Families

M. Wild animals, new minds and the future

12 arguments in Part DIR.

Underlying question: Should we help, not just stop harming?
Dominant error: Moral (omission bias, appeal to nature)

M1

Wild animals live free and happy

The adults we see are the exception: in most species, almost all young die shortly after birth, from hunger, cold, disease or predation

Full chapter
M2

Suffering and death are part of nature

Diseases are part of human life too, and that was never a reason not to treat them; the harm isn't smaller for the victim because no one is to blame

Full chapter
M3

We didn't cause it, so we have no duty to help

Omission bias: no one would accept this reasoning about a drowning child or flood victims

Full chapter
M4

It's impossible to solve suffering in nature; it's too big and complex

Not being able to solve everything is no reason to do nothing: we already vaccinate foxes, rescue animals in disasters, and can research to do more

Full chapter
M5

Meddling with nature is wrong; we could make everything worse

Risk calls for study and caution, as in medicine, not for omission: that is the proposal of welfare biology

Full chapter
M6

Who are we to interfere with nature?

We interfere all the time, with cities, farming and medicine; and no one calls helping an injured person arrogant

Full chapter
M7

A balanced nature is good for animals

Balance measures numbers, not wellbeing; and environmental programmes kill thousands of animals for goals we would never accept for humans

Full chapter
M8

Helping wild animals isn't veganism; it's a different cause

If sentience is what matters, suffering doesn't stop counting because we didn't cause it; and one cause doesn't stop us researching the other

Full chapter
M9

Machines will never feel; robots and AIs need no rights

If an artificial mind ever feels, its substrate matters no more than species does; and uncertainty calls for precaution before creating minds at scale

Full chapter
M10

Using medicine and genetics to end suffering is playing God

We already use anaesthesia, vaccines and painkillers without calling it playing God; the issue is safety and consent, not the natural origin of pain

Full chapter
M11

Those not yet born don't matter

Whoever is born will feel what we leave them: that's why burying toxic waste is wrong, even if the victims don't exist yet

Full chapter
M12

That's science fiction; we have real problems now

An uncertain but immense risk can deserve attention, and much of what reduces future suffering, like widening the moral circle, also helps now

Full chapter